Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 2, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Property owner supported Option 2 or 3, noting plans to build a new commercial building were stalled by UDOT interchange delays.
Planning Commission - Sep 2, 2026 · 2:08:57 →Expressed support for Option 2 after confirming his property is not affected.
Planning Commission - Sep 2, 2026 · 2:13:31 →Voiced support for Option 2 or 3 for job creation and economic growth.
Planning Commission - Sep 2, 2026 · 2:17:53 →Spoke in favor of Option 2 or 3 for West Ogden zone changes, emphasizing that manufacturing drives economic value and job creation.
Planning Commission - Sep 2, 2026 · 2:08:39 →Supported option 2 or 3, pointing out the area is already a mixed-use hodgepodge and M2 zoning helps property values and business expansion.
Planning Commission - Sep 2, 2026 · 2:13:07 →Property owner on Doxy Street requested M2 zoning under option 3 or 2.
Planning Commission - Sep 2, 2026 · 2:16:10 →Expressed strong support for M2 zoning under option 2 or 3, citing heavy industrial truck traffic and nearby commercial presence.
Planning Commission - Sep 2, 2026 · 2:16:54 →